{"id":7325,"date":"2024-10-07T07:51:48","date_gmt":"2024-10-07T07:51:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/produkt\/0\/"},"modified":"2024-10-07T09:52:49","modified_gmt":"2024-10-07T07:52:49","slug":"978-3-7983-2078-9","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/produkt\/978-3-7983-2078-9\/","title":{"rendered":"Erneuerung der Erneuerung?"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

Today\u2019s cities are challenged by a new spatial order that stimulates social exclusion amongst the members of their populations. Renewal has always sought to meet this challenge: from the development of the sensitive renewal in the 1980s to the variety of today’s \u201eSoziale Stadt\u201c and \u201eStadtumbau\u201c which are the new programmatic columns of renewal. Whilst the sensitive renewal (\u201eBehutsame Stadterneuerung\u201c) is linked to a physical refurbishment, \u201eSoziale Stadt\u201c, ‘Social City\u2019 in literal translation, tries to concentrate on the socio-economic aspects of renewal, and, eventually, \u201eStadtumbau\u201c, literally \u2018Urban Redevelopment\u2019, was created due to the massive appearance of empty premises. Today, these renewal programs incorporate high competence in solving distinct problems in the urban quarter, but, regardless of how, lack competence in avoiding them. Saying so, we might consider that traditional renewal defines its goals in enabling urban quarters to challenge future problems on their own by virtue of sustainably achieved structures. After the completion of a renewal program an urban quarter, thus, should be provided with a healthier environment, cohesive living conditions, and empowered inhabitants organised in supportive networks. This approach \u2013 per se \u2013 is good, but in view of various urban quarters that experience a kind of programmatic career in renewal patterns for the last 25 years and more, this desirable approach often seems to have failed its effects. Consequently, this thesis connects the historic development of programmatic renewal patterns with the sociological framework of today’s cities. Part A is devoted to the phenomenon of exclusion and tries to define what makes inter\u00acvention by renewal necessary and when. As a result, intervention fields will be elaborated \u2013 fields of action in which renewal should tackle local disadvantage. These intervention fields will then be the basis for a systematization in Part B in which the history of German renewal since the 1980s, the \u201cvictory\u201d of sensitive renewal, will be told three times in order to highlight three different fields of tension: first, the one between physical and social renewal, secondly the one between (non-)participation and (dis-)empowerment of the quarter’s inhabitants and, lastly, the one between the comprehensive and incrementalistic planning approaches. Afterwards, the five intervention fields will be conceptually analysed to gain an output-oriented pro\u00acgrammatic conclusion for renewal that acts against exclusionary mechanisms instead of the more input-oriented programmatical columns. The result will be a \u201cpentagon of intervention\u201c against exclusion. It consists of: <\/div>\n
\u25cf Material equipment (infrastructure included) <\/div>\n
\u25cf Factual accessibility (of infrastructure) <\/div>\n
\u25cf Communication and networks <\/div>\n
\u25cf Escape Opportunity <\/div>\n
\u25cf Symbolism and image <\/div>\n
With the help of two recent German debates on renewal, integrated development and continuation, the third part addresses a summation for a new role of renewal, which will eventually be drafted into a modular model of renewal. On the basis of such a modular strategy of renewal units planners can specify more precisely which parts of a renewal process have to last continuously, which temporarily, and in how far a renewal process can concentrate on the empowerment of the inhabitants to enable them to break out from social deprivation individually. This draft of a model also takes an interest in the discourse about \u201ethird ways\u201c between incrementalism and comprehensive planning. The draft itself is not ought to serve as a complete answer to today’s challenge but as a possible pathway in society’s debate.<\/div>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Today\u2019s cities are challenged by a new spatial order that stimulates social exclusion amongst the members of their populations. Renewal has always sought to meet this challenge: from the development of the sensitive renewal in the 1980s to the variety of today’s \u201eSoziale Stadt\u201c and \u201eStadtumbau\u201c which are the new programmatic columns of renewal. Whilst the sensitive renewal (\u201eBehutsame Stadterneuerung\u201c) is linked to a physical refurbishment, \u201eSoziale Stadt\u201c, ‘Social City\u2019 in literal translation, tries to concentrate on the socio-economic aspects of renewal, and, eventually, \u201eStadtumbau\u201c, literally \u2018Urban Redevelopment\u2019, was created due to the massive appearance of empty premises. Today, these renewal programs incorporate high competence in solving distinct problems in the urban quarter, but, regardless of how, lack competence in avoiding them. Saying so, we might consider that traditional renewal defines its goals in enabling urban quarters to challenge future problems on their own by virtue of sustainably achieved structures. After the completion of a renewal program an urban quarter, thus, should be provided with a healthier environment, cohesive living conditions, and empowered inhabitants organised in supportive networks. This approach \u2013 per se \u2013 is good, but in view of various urban quarters that experience a kind of programmatic career in renewal patterns for the last 25 years and more, this desirable approach often seems to have failed its effects. Consequently, this thesis connects the historic development of programmatic renewal patterns with the sociological framework of today’s cities. Part A is devoted to the phenomenon of exclusion and tries to define what makes inter\u00acvention by renewal necessary and when. As a result, intervention fields will be elaborated \u2013 fields of action in which renewal should tackle local disadvantage. These intervention fields will then be the basis for a systematization in Part B in which the history of German renewal since the 1980s, the \u201cvictory\u201d of sensitive renewal, will be told three times in order to highlight three different fields of tension: first, the one between physical and social renewal, secondly the one between (non-)participation and (dis-)empowerment of the quarter’s inhabitants and, lastly, the one between the comprehensive and incrementalistic planning approaches. Afterwards, the five intervention fields will be conceptually analysed to gain an output-oriented pro\u00acgrammatic conclusion for renewal that acts against exclusionary mechanisms instead of the more input-oriented programmatical columns. The result will be a \u201cpentagon of intervention\u201c against exclusion. It consists of: <\/div>\n
\u25cf Material equipment (infrastructure included) <\/div>\n
\u25cf Factual accessibility (of infrastructure) <\/div>\n
\u25cf Communication and networks <\/div>\n
\u25cf Escape Opportunity <\/div>\n
\u25cf Symbolism and image <\/div>\n
With the help of two recent German debates on renewal, integrated development and continuation, the third part addresses a summation for a new role of renewal, which will eventually be drafted into a modular model of renewal. On the basis of such a modular strategy of renewal units planners can specify more precisely which parts of a renewal process have to last continuously, which temporarily, and in how far a renewal process can concentrate on the empowerment of the inhabitants to enable them to break out from social deprivation individually. This draft of a model also takes an interest in the discourse about \u201ethird ways\u201c between incrementalism and comprehensive planning. The draft itself is not ought to serve as a complete answer to today’s challenge but as a possible pathway in society’s debate.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":7877,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"class_list":["post-7325","product","type-product","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","product_cat-institut-fuer-stadt-und-regionalplanung","product_tag-stadtumbau-governance-sanierung-infrastruktur-exklusion","autor-arvid-krueger","reihe-isr-impulse-online-bis-bd-50-isr-graue-reihe","edition-universitaetsverlag-tu-berlin"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/7325","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7325"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7877"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}