{"id":5480,"date":"2023-06-29T15:22:38","date_gmt":"2023-06-29T15:22:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/produkt\/empty-product-container-212\/"},"modified":"2023-06-29T17:23:39","modified_gmt":"2023-06-29T15:23:39","slug":"978-3-7983-2722-1","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/produkt\/978-3-7983-2722-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Bauherren und Baukultur"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> &#8220;The paper was created based on professional experience and the summary of insights gained as architect with property developer functions within a public building authority. I formulated hypotheses to motivate further discussions and to counteract the current random and fragmented vagueness of the terms &#8216;building culture&#8217; and &#8216;property developer&#8217; with a holistic understanding and to redefine the position of property developers as players within building culture. Three complementary models are presented to explain the &#8216;building culture: 1.) The social secondary culture with five elements, which establish the building culture status, 2.) their normative meta-system which determines quality with a multi-dimensional quality structure and 3.) building culture as a dynamic connection between cultural elements which change due to explicit influences and individual creativity. These views contradict some of today&#8217;s opinions in which building culture is understood to be &#8220;&#8221;outstanding quality&#8221;&#8221; of construction and architecture, whilst not defining those aspects in detail. Therefore, today&#8217;s definition of the quality term and several contemporary building evaluation systems were analysed and based on all the above. A typology and a multidimensional overall quality description or quality categories for buildings has been developed. These include psychological basic needs as quality requirements for buildings which are described in a model. I define &#8220;&#8221;property developers&#8221;&#8221; with five of their most substantial features and created a typology of six value based property developer models. I developed a new process-oriented complete catalogue for their tasks detailing those that can be delegated and those that cannot be delegated. This was supplemented with a suggestion that those &#8220;&#8221;core tasks&#8221;&#8221; which cannot be delegated from those that can be delegated according to the &#8220;&#8221;Principal-Agent-Theory&#8221;&#8221; are differentiated. I added descriptions of building culture effects and a skill profile for professional property developers which I consider necessary for building trade and architectural skills. Finally, I provided an example of a professional institutional property developer based on a public building authority in Berlin and their building culture positioning. I described their history, organisation, tasks and services, their personal and financial resources, their inclusion in the political and administration context and recent changes with regards to their identity.&#8221;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&#8220;The paper was created based on professional experience and the summary of insights gained as architect with property developer functions within a public building authority. I formulated hypotheses to motivate further discussions and to counteract the current random and fragmented vagueness of the terms &#8216;building culture&#8217; and &#8216;property developer&#8217; with a holistic understanding and to redefine the position of property developers as players within building culture. Three complementary models are presented to explain the &#8216;building culture: 1.) The social secondary culture with five elements, which establish the building culture status, 2.) their normative meta-system which determines quality with a multi-dimensional quality structure and 3.) building culture as a dynamic connection between cultural elements which change due to explicit influences and individual creativity. These views contradict some of today&#8217;s opinions in which building culture is understood to be &#8220;&#8221;outstanding quality&#8221;&#8221; of construction and architecture, whilst not defining those aspects in detail. Therefore, today&#8217;s definition of the quality term and several contemporary building evaluation systems were analysed and based on all the above. A typology and a multidimensional overall quality description or quality categories for buildings has been developed. These include psychological basic needs as quality requirements for buildings which are described in a model. I define &#8220;&#8221;property developers&#8221;&#8221; with five of their most substantial features and created a typology of six value based property developer models. I developed a new process-oriented complete catalogue for their tasks detailing those that can be delegated and those that cannot be delegated. This was supplemented with a suggestion that those &#8220;&#8221;core tasks&#8221;&#8221; which cannot be delegated from those that can be delegated according to the &#8220;&#8221;Principal-Agent-Theory&#8221;&#8221; are differentiated. I added descriptions of building culture effects and a skill profile for professional property developers which I consider necessary for building trade and architectural skills. Finally, I provided an example of a professional institutional property developer based on a public building authority in Berlin and their building culture positioning. I described their history, organisation, tasks and services, their personal and financial resources, their inclusion in the political and administration context and recent changes with regards to their identity.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":1159,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"class_list":["post-5480","product","type-product","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","product_cat-fak-vi-planen-bauen-umwelt","product_tag-bauherren-baukultur-bauqualitaet-bauverwaltung-delegation-grundbeduerfnisse-qualitaet-basic-needs-building-culture-building-quality-property-developer-public-authority-quality","autor-peter-luettmann","edition-universitaetsverlag-tu-berlin"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/5480","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5480"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1159"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}