{"id":5366,"date":"2024-12-18T13:28:38","date_gmt":"2024-12-18T13:28:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/produkt\/empty-product-container-102\/"},"modified":"2024-12-18T15:29:40","modified_gmt":"2024-12-18T14:29:40","slug":"978-3-7983-3076-4","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/produkt\/978-3-7983-3076-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Keine Zeit f\u00fcr den C-Test?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> The C-test has come to be known as an objective, reliable and valid means of measuring general language proficiency. Many studies support its interrelation with several language sub-skills: reading comprehension, listening comprehension, speaking, writing, vocabulary, grammar. By contrast, the S-C-test \u2013 a substantially speeded up version of this testing format \u2013 has not yet been investigated in depth. The purpose of the study at hand is to help fill this gap.<br \/>This thesis deals with the question concerning the influence the drastic reduction of time allotted to complete the test has on the C-test. <br \/>Underlying is an assumption made by Grotjahn et al. (2010) hypothesizing that adding a speed factor to the C-test, thus simulating real time language use, might lead to higher correlations with listening comprehension and speaking tasks.<br \/>After a theoretical discussion of the origin, construction, variants and applications of C-tests, studies dealing with correlational analyses or using a speeded C-test will be examined.<br \/>In the second part of this thesis, C-tests and speeded C-tests will be compared, with data gathered from adult learners of German in a university context. As will be seen, S-C-tests reach a sufficient reliability. In fact, correlational analyses show that S-C-tests are more closely related to listening comprehension than commonly used C-tests. As far as speaking is concerned, both test versions yield similar results. Correlations with both language skills are considerably stronger for advanced learners than for less advanced ones.<br \/>To sum up, the S-C-test appears to be a reliable test instrument that is appropriate for measuring foreign language competence in low stakes situations, especially for advanced learners.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The C-test has come to be known as an objective, reliable and valid means of measuring general language proficiency. Many studies support its interrelation with several language sub-skills: reading comprehension, listening comprehension, speaking, writing, vocabulary, grammar. By contrast, the S-C-test \u2013 a substantially speeded up version of this testing format \u2013 has not yet been investigated in depth. The purpose of the study at hand is to help fill this gap.<br \/>This thesis deals with the question concerning the influence the drastic reduction of time allotted to complete the test has on the C-test. <br \/>Underlying is an assumption made by Grotjahn et al. (2010) hypothesizing that adding a speed factor to the C-test, thus simulating real time language use, might lead to higher correlations with listening comprehension and speaking tasks.<br \/>After a theoretical discussion of the origin, construction, variants and applications of C-tests, studies dealing with correlational analyses or using a speeded C-test will be examined.<br \/>In the second part of this thesis, C-tests and speeded C-tests will be compared, with data gathered from adult learners of German in a university context. As will be seen, S-C-tests reach a sufficient reliability. In fact, correlational analyses show that S-C-tests are more closely related to listening comprehension than commonly used C-tests. As far as speaking is concerned, both test versions yield similar results. Correlations with both language skills are considerably stronger for advanced learners than for less advanced ones.<br \/>To sum up, the S-C-test appears to be a reliable test instrument that is appropriate for measuring foreign language competence in low stakes situations, especially for advanced learners.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":1491,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false},"class_list":["post-5366","product","type-product","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","product_cat-institut-fuer-sprache-und-kommunikation","product_tag-correlation-konstrukt-construct-speed-c-test-s-c-test-geschwindigkeit-korrelation-s-c-test-c-test","autor-kerstin-zimmermann","edition-universitaetsverlag-tu-berlin"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product\/5366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/product"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/product"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5366"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1491"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/verlag.tu-berlin.de\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}